Comments on: Why is Sam Keep Looking for Defenders?

By: bli wedhooz

bli wedhooz — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:39:27 +0000

well, actually i didnt like what i saw at bolton when BSA still got the job there. But to realize that i could also see him do the same stuff at Newcastle, it doesnt bother me at all..
Well i guess im kind a result-oriented person, not like madrista peoples who couldnt satisfied with the champion title cause they want to win it with the attactive football too, to greedy imho…

PS: bramble sure better than boumsong but only when it comes to the stupidity, lack of speed and bad decision making.. lol

By: Shearyadi

Shearyadi — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:17:13 +0000

yeah, I was not too fancy either with negative football, but what I saw in Sam's policy is not pure defensive side. He is also pay attention to the attacking side, that's why he wants to strengthen our back four so he knows for sure the attack is having confident to do their job :)

By: Andrias

Andrias — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:29:39 +0000

Couldnt agree more.

No matter how many goals Drogba scored last season, it was Chelsea’s defensive gaphole that lost them the title.

Over the years, we’ve seen Manchester United prioritised resolute backline over prolific foward.

For all the flair of Henry & Van Persie & Cesc & their beautiful fluid football, defensive failure has always been Arsenal’s shortcoming.

Look where Portsmouth finished last season….

PS. I still believe that Bramble is a better player than Boumsong. Bramble is oozing with class when he awakes. Problem is, he only awakes for 80mins in a game. Hehehehhee…..